Efficiency versus effectiveness. What is the difference?
Michael Hammett’s article “Vacation Your Way to Better Health” featured in
Arrive’s July/August 2012 publication is a solid example.
In fewer than 300 words, Hammett efficiently conveys
advice—take more vacations to improve health—and why people should follow his
suggestion. He fluidly blends his lede and nut graf into one paragraph and
offers an ‘aha!’ moment. Hammett lists commitments we should be making to lead healthy lives, such as eating nutritiously and exercising
regularly. He then suggests adding vacations to the list. My first thought: “That’s it?”
Although an easy 30-second read with a strong introduction,
the second half of Hammett’s article loses effectiveness. Effectiveness
includes both how and what you present.
| The freedom of vacation |
Two academic studies strengthen Hammett’s argument.
Ph.D. Researcher Brooks B. Gump, provides disturbing statistics. Citing him
validates the article, but referencing expedia.com concerns me. I question
expedia.com’s motives for conducting their survey and the data procured. I
question Arrive’s corporate relationship with expedia.com.
Quotes from Gump charge this piece but the concluding
quotation does nothing to forward the argument. It reiterates the previous
paragraph and just ends. Hammett could have created a stronger, original
concluding sentence or cut the last two paragraphs and concluded with Gump’s
quote in the third last paragraph.
I question Arrive’s corporate relationship with expedia.com.
ReplyDeletego here